Dr. Doug Cremer, dean of the College of Transdisciplinarity at Woodbury University, is featured in this
spotlight article of PUPN Magazine.
Though the College of Transdisciplinarity at Woodbury University is newly christened, the collaboration and holistic course designs at the heart of transdisciplinarity—and the efforts that bridge various practices and multiple perspectives—is certainly not new to the campus. Dr. Doug Cremer of Woodbury University is a living embodiment of the four pillars that form the core of student experiences at the university: Transdisciplinarity, Design Thinking, Entrepreneurship, and Civic Engagement.
From the article:
Cremer acknowledges that there are certainly
challenges to creating transdisciplinary
courses and programs. He recognizes a
university would need faculty “willing to
bend and explore.” He points out, however,
that faculty members at any institution
must be willing to update and revise every
year to stay current, so the faculty members
at leading universities are already “always
adapting and always changing.” He suggests
being unafraid of the change, as well,
because—in addition to better serving
the students—faculty are “empowered to
explore and push and change,” while still
requiring the highest quality of analysis,
writing, and collaboration. ...
In 2006, the old School of Arts and Sciences was being evolved
back into a General Education department, so they asked, “How
do we reinvent ourselves?” They performed what Cremer calls “a
little departmental jiu-jitsu” and discovered ways to move beyond
interdisciplinarity (which they had already been doing a while) in order
to tackle problems that could not be solved by disciplines alone—
environmental damage, ethical lapses, conflict resolution.
They wanted students to consider ethical stances of new technologies—
for instance, looking at the ways an overreliance on machines can lead to
a lack of humanity, when there is not enough incorporation of flexibility
and compassion.
They wanted course work that constantly reminded
students in business and design that there was more to consider than
profit or product alone—the “moral rules, ethical principles for every
living thing on the planet.” Ultimately, though they recognized and
satisfied their charge to accommodate General Education practices, they
also used that opportunity to turn those practices transdisciplinary.
Cremer adds that they aren’t “wedded to any conventional orthodoxy,”
and faculty members are encouraged to directly challenge orthodoxies
even in fields where they teach and thus model that academic resistance
for their students. He adds, “Why do this if we aren’t willing to stick our
necks out? That’s what you do in a university.”
THE PRACTICALITY OF TRANSDISIPLINARITY
Cremer admits that many educators might find the pragmatics of
transdisciplinary course design to be daunting. However, he reminds
us that our goals for students must go beyond preparing students for
moving one step past graduation. He suggests that educators have to do
both: prepare students to secure jobs—impressing potential employers
with their academic training—and prepare students to excel in those
jobs, using advanced cognitive and human-relation skills.
Cremer explains, “Practical is not just giving people the basic skills
these days—so from a practical nature, this approach still makes the
most sense because the dual approach allows them to thrive”—preparing
them fully for what happens after they get the “yes.” The transdisciplinary
approach does that as a “commitment to a broader vision” where the
“broader goal is the most pragmatic.”
Read more about the
College of Transdisciplinarity at Woodbury.
No comments:
Post a Comment